Finally, i have found my own place over the web & this blog has been moved to http://venkatreddy.in
Check out the new destination for latest updates
New destination - http://venkatreddy.in
Published October 8, 2007 Articles , Books , Bug Tracking , Certification , Code Based Testing , Code Coverage , Code Metrics , JUnit , Java , Lessons Learned , Life , Links , Magazines , Metrics , Open Source , Personal , Programming , Quality Assurance , Software Development , Software Metrics , Software Testing , Static Analysis , Technical Support , Technology , Test Automation , Test Documentation , Test Management , Test Methodologies , Test Metrics , Test Strategy , Testing Resources , Testing Tools , Thinking like a Tester , Thoughts , Tools , Training , Unit Testing , User Manuals , Whitebox Testing 0 CommentsNon linear paths from Application Code
Published October 4, 2007 Code Based Testing , Code Metrics , Java , Lessons Learned , Software Development , Software Metrics , Software Testing , Static Analysis , Technology , Test Management , Test Methodologies , Thoughts , Tools , Unit Testing , Whitebox Testing 0 CommentsThe applications become complex as their code base increases. This has challenges for the testers to determine the nonlinear paths in the application.
Most of the Static Analysis tools over the application code helps us to identify the cyclomatic complexity (nonlinear paths) at a method level. These might be helpful to validate those methods and to achieve good code coverage over the same.
But the Code coverage at a Unit Level may not be a big help since most of the end user scenarios won’t run after unit level paths. These paths is an integration of the above unit level paths.
Since the Testers focus on simulating the end user scenarios, it will be good to identify all the possible nonlinear paths around the application code base and capture the code coverage based on these paths.
You might want to go through some discussion around this on Linkedin Answers
In case you have similar experiences over white box testing drop me a mail at venkatreddyc@gmail.com
Happy Testing…
Powered by ScribeFire.
Software Testing - Is it a cost or an Investment for Stakeholders ?
Published September 24, 2007 Articles , Project Management , Software Development , Software Testing , Technology , Thoughts 5 CommentsSoftware Testing is considered as a Cost for some Stakeholders & an Investment for others in their context of operation. It’s good to know the status in your context. I had this query in LinkedIn Answers & thought of sharing the good discussion to my blog readers.
Do you consider Software Testing as an Investment or a Cost in your Context ?
Ability to identify the hot spots of release from Bug Database
Published September 24, 2007 Articles , Bug Tracking , Code Metrics , Lessons Learned , Metrics , Project Management , Software Metrics , Software Testing , Technology , Test Metrics , Thoughts , Tools 0 CommentsBug Database for the products might have thousands of issues over a period of time against various builds and releases. Though these issues fixed over a period of time, it might be hard to derive meaningful metrics over the release.
We need to support these releases over the production systems & it might be helpful to capture the hotspots / risk elements with the release. Most of the issues here to deal with the respective features, compatibility with other features / technologies & performance related issues.
The usual metrics of number of issues against a module and their severity levels may not be of help always.
How easy is it to derive the following from the Bug Database for a given release
- Identify the issues have originated from Requirements, Design & Implementation
- Identify the issues over their category (Functional, Performance, Security, Compatibility, Usability etc)
- Identify the issues along with their origin & category over the features rather than the modules / components
Powered by ScribeFire.
The Life Cycle of a Bug - Different Stages in it.
Published September 10, 2007 Articles , Bug Tracking , Lessons Learned , Software Testing , Technology , Test Documentation , Test Management , Test Methodologies , Testing Tools , Thinking like a Tester 2 CommentsIn this post, i will explore different stages of the Bug from it’s inception to closer. The Bug has been found and logged into the Bug Tracking System. It’s my fourth post in the Bug Life Cycle series.
- The Bug has been found and logged into the Bug Tracking System. It will be treated as New Bug in the System.
- The Bug will be assigned to the concerned Developer for a Resolution.
- The developer looks in to the possibilities of the resoultion & takes a call on Resolution by fixing it or differing over the information provided.
- Tester validates the resolved issue in the build & checks for the regression scenarios over the fix.
- If the issue found fixed, then he choose to Close the issue else he / she will Re-open the same.
- The Cycle follows again for the re-opened issue till it get’s closed.
It worth doing the following activities
- Capturing the required and re-usable info to the Bug Report at it’s each stage.
- Check for all the closed bugs of Severity 1 & 2 against final build for the release.
In the next post, I will share my thoughts on the useful metrics over the Bug Tracking Repository.
Happy Testing..
